Monday, April 15, 2024

Reading with Migrants in the Middle of the World - Michèle Petit.

I began to imagine the journey of "Reading with Migrants

in the Middle of the World" in 2020, the year when the

coronavirus pandemic forced us to stay at home and cancel

any possible travel plans. However, in the midst of that

context of social isolation and mobility restrictions, I was

invited to create and lead virtual reading workshops for

Venezuelan and Ecuadorian children beneficiaries of a project,

among whose objectives was to generate spaces and dynamics

of integration between the migrant population and the host

population. I confess that at first it was not easy to imagine

how to achieve that those children would integrate while each

one was confined to their home, relying only on the remote

images and sounds that could reach them through a cell phone

or a computer. At that moment of initial confusion, I also couldn't

conceive how to read to them or show them a book and develop

reading mediation activities that would foster dialogues,

encounters, and discoveries from a distance. Deprived of the

certainties provided by the availability of a physical space full of

books and materials for manual work; of the effects of the voice

and the close presence of the mediator to motivate reading and

conversation; and of the spontaneous integration dynamics that

occur among people when they share a space or an experience;

I felt lost.


Fortunately, books provided me with asylum. The first ones to

welcome me were the writings of Michèle Petit, some of which

I had read some time ago from the comfort of an observer.

However, in my new situation, her reflections on "What Reading

is For" (2008, p.41-74); "the habitable nature of books" (p.51);

and the possibilities that literature offers us to reanimate our

interiority, put ourselves in the shoes of others, or expand our

being through the celebration of the imaginary (p.123), gave

me the first impulse to carry out those virtual workshops where

I put my own trust in books and literature to "bring together

what is separated" (p.112) to the test. Following Petit's advice,

I set out to practice the "art of hospitality and availability" (p.164)

and turn those virtual rooms into "reading shelters"; all I needed

was how to do it. It was then when I came across the book "To

Read in Adverse Contexts and Other Emerging Spaces"

(Secretaría de Cultura de México, 2018), where not only did

I find ideas that reinforced my confidence for working with

migrants and host populations in "emerging spaces" - such

as the virtual one - but I also discovered that this book made

available to mediators, promoters, and artists the systematization

of experiences with methodologies of "cultural attention" (p.9)

implemented both in scenarios of human mobility and natural or

social tragedies, as well as in educational settings to strengthen

teachers' competencies.



Among the various experiences and methodologies shared

there, the research and projects carried out by Evelyn Arizpe

revealed to me the potential of the picture book to generate

cultural exchanges and foster the creation of meanings. In

particular, the project "Reading with Migrants" provided me

with the methodology to turn books and reading into symbolic

shelters where children felt welcomed, safe, and encouraged

to build bridges between them, through the shared reading of

picture books and children's and youth literature, accompanied

by reading mediation activities. These activities were illuminated

by the mediation model applied by Arizpe, based on the metaphor

"mirrors, windows, and doors," elaborated by Rudine Sims Bishop

(1990), who shows us that as a mirror, literature offers readers

the possibility of seeing themselves reflected in the characters;

as a window, seeing the lives of others and knowing other possible

ways of inhabiting the world; and as a door, confronting reality

to cross thresholds, take a step forward, or close and leave behind

old cycles.


The virtual reading workshop sessions with Venezuelan and

Ecuadorian children extended over six months, and after their

conclusion, I had the desire to share the experience with other

mediators. I sensed the need, especially in Ecuador, to somehow

replicate the training program "Reading with Migrants" led in

Mexico by Evelyn Arizpe, as Ecuador has experienced significant

waves of migration and internal population movements in its

recent history. According to reports from the IOM, in 2019 it

was listed as "the main recipient of refugees in Latin America"

(IOM Ecuador, 2019). The opportunity arose with the opening

of a call for cultural or training projects in the public competition

for the "Promotion of Culture and Human Rights 2020" line,

from the Institute for the Promotion of Creativity and Innovation.

Inspired both by the methodology and the philosophy of the

"Reading with Migrants" program, Natali Lalangui and I applied

with the training program "Reading with Migrants in the Middle

of the World," which won funding for its implementation.

The project's objective was to train librarians, teachers, reading

mediators, and human rights promoters from the Metropolitan

District of Quito and other provinces of the country in

methodologies and tools to create intercultural reading itineraries

with communities in migration or human mobility contexts.

The training program took place virtually and brought together

a diverse group of mediators and professionals in terms of their

knowledge, origins, and the type of population they interact with.

Among the 18 participants, we had mediators of both Ecuadorian

and Venezuelan, Peruvian, and Colombian nationality, residing in

different parts of Ecuador. In addition, we had two reading

mediators from Brazil, for whom geographical distance and linguistic

differences posed no barrier. And so, from the very formation of the

group of participants, we began to live that experience of

"reading with migrants."


Guided by this purpose, we designed, led, and journeyed

together with the participants through ten virtual sessions using

the workshop methodology. We began "Imagining the Journey"

by approaching the reality of migration and its effects; "Packing

Our Bags" by exploring the tools provided by reading mediation;

"Starting the Trek" by reading the world from contexts of crisis

and migration and discovering the potential of children's and

youth literature and picture books for these spaces. Finally, we

"Explored Routes" with the gracious participation of Evelyn Arizpe,

who generously explained to us the model of reading mediation:

mirrors, windows, doors; and we learned how to develop a reading

itinerary that fostered encounters between the host population

and the migrant population, encounters that would alleviate some

of the burden of the grief that migrants must process. With all this,

we began to "Map Out" under the compass of reading mediation

resources, to create activities that allowed for the exchange of

experiences and emotions in a respectful and sensitive manner.

Once the paths were established, we encouraged the participants

to "Open Their Bags" to think about the "Creation of Reading

Shelters"; for this, we asked them to design their own reading

itineraries and put them to the test with the group. Thus, during

the practical sessions of the training program, we were able to

experiment with and provide feedback on each of the itineraries

designed by the participants, itineraries that are already being

put into practice in their work environments.



According to the testimonies of the participants themselves,

this training process was quite a journey in which they filled

their bags with valuable tools that they are eager to share in

different contexts, as they lend themselves to it. Especially, we

are glad to know that participating in the program meant, in the

words of one of our mediators, being able to close, "that circle,

that void of longing" for her country. Also, as they expressed, it

was an opportunity to encounter diverse perspectives on the

craft of reading mediation and to feel that during the journey,

everyone was a teacher sharing their knowledge; to recognize

how for mediators, the exercise of cultural transmission through

reading is transformative and becomes a window to see the

world with renewed eyes, a mirror to see themselves reflected

in shared reading experiences, and a door to encounter the

other in more hospitable, welcoming, and human spaces.

Paulo Freire

Paulo Freire was a Brazilian educator and philosopher whose

ideas about education have had a profound influence on pedagogy

and social theory. Here's a synthesis of some of his key concepts:


Critical Pedagogy: At the heart of Freire's philosophy is the concept

of critical pedagogy, which emphasizes the role of education in

fostering critical consciousness and empowering marginalized groups.

He believed that education should not be a process of depositing

knowledge into passive minds but rather a dialogical process of

mutual learning and transformation.


Problem-Posing Education: Freire advocated for a pedagogical

approach known as problem-posing education, where teachers

and students engage in a collaborative process of inquiry and

reflection. Instead of simply transmitting information, educators

should encourage students to critically analyze their social reality,

identify problems, and work towards solutions.


Dialogue and Praxis: Central to Freire's approach is the idea of

dialogue as a means of liberation. He believed that genuine

dialogue, characterized by mutual respect and understanding,

could lead to the creation of a more just and democratic society.

Furthermore, Freire emphasized the importance of praxis, or the

integration of reflection and action, in the learning process.

Education should not only inform but also inspire individuals

to take action to transform their world.


Conscientization: Freire introduced the concept of conscientization,

which refers to the process of becoming critically aware of the social,

political, and economic forces that shape one's life. Through

conscientization, individuals are able to recognize the root causes

of oppression and work towards collective liberation.


Banking Concept vs. Problem-Posing Education: Freire criticized

what he called the "banking concept" of education, where teachers

deposit knowledge into the minds of passive students. Instead, he

advocated for problem-posing education, where students are active

participants in the learning process and co-creators of knowledge.


Education for Liberation: Ultimately, Freire saw education as a tool

for liberation and social transformation. By empowering individuals

to critically analyze their world and take action to change it,

education has the potential to break down oppressive structures

and create a more just and equitable society.



Discussion. 


Critical Pedagogy in Practice: Can educators implement critical

pedagogy in the classroom, considering both the challenges and

benefits of this approach?


The Role of Dialogue in Education: Explore the significance of

dialogue as a tool for learning and liberation. How can educators

facilitate meaningful dialogue in diverse classroom settings?


Conscientization and Empowerment: Examine the concept of

conscientization and its role in empowering individuals to critically

analyze their social reality. How can educators promote

conscientization among students?


Banking Concept vs. Problem-Posing Education: Compare and

contrast Freire's critique of the banking concept of education

with his advocacy for problem-posing education. What are the

implications of each approach for student learning and social

transformation?


Education for Liberation: Discuss the idea of education as a

tool for liberation and social change. How can educators

cultivate a sense of agency and empowerment among students

to become agents of change in their communities?


Critical Literacy: Explore the concept of critical literacy and its

importance in enabling individuals to critically engage with

texts and media. How can educators teach critical literacy

skills to empower students to question dominant narratives

and ideologies?


Intersectionality and Social Justice Education: Consider how

Freire's ideas intersect with theories of intersectionality and

social justice education. How can educators address issues of

power, privilege, and oppression in the classroom?


Global Perspectives on Education: Reflect on the relevance of

Freire's ideas in different cultural and geopolitical contexts.

How might his concepts be adapted to address the unique

challenges and opportunities facing educators around the

world?


Student Voice and Participation: Discuss strategies for

promoting student voice and participation in the learning

process, drawing on Freire's emphasis on dialogue and praxis.

How can educators create inclusive classroom environments

where all students feel heard and valued?


Educational Reform and Policy: Consider the implications of

Freire's ideas for educational reform and policy-making. How

can policymakers and education leaders integrate principles

of critical pedagogy into broader efforts to improve

education systems?

Marx and Education

  1. Marx and Education. 


In Marxist theory, education is seen as a crucial component

of the superstructure, which reflects and perpetuates the dominant

ideologies and social relations of the economic base.

Here are some key points in the Marxist interpretation of education:


Reproduction of Social Class: Marxists argue that education systems

primarily serve to reproduce the existing social hierarchy by transmitting

the values, norms, and knowledge that support the capitalist mode of

production. This perpetuates class divisions and maintains the dominance

of the ruling class.


Ideological State Apparatus: Education is considered one of the

ideological state apparatuses through which the ruling class maintains

its power by promoting ideologies that justify and legitimize the existing

social order. This includes values such as individualism,

competition, and meritocracy, which serve the interests of the ruling class.


Role in Capitalist Economy; Education also plays a functional role

in the capitalist economy by providing the skilled labor force

required for capitalist production. It prepares individuals for their future

roles in the workforce, reinforcing the division of labor and the exploitation

of labor by capital.


Hidden Curriculum: Marxist theorists argue that education has a

"hidden curriculum" that teaches implicit lessons about social norms,

obedience to authority, and acceptance of inequality. This hidden curriculum

serves to reinforce the existing power structures and social relations.


Critical Consciousness: Despite its role in reproducing inequality,

education also has the potential to foster critical consciousness among

students. Marxist educators advocate for a critical pedagogy that

encourages students to analyze and challenge the dominant ideologies

and social structures.


Discussion topics:


The Role of Education in Reproducing Social Inequality: how does education perpetuate social class divisions and reinforce

the existing power structures?


Meritocracy or Myth?: Does education truly function as a meritocratic

system where individuals are rewarded based on their abilities and

efforts, or if it merely serves as a tool for reproducing privilege?


Education and Capitalist Economy: Explore the relationship between

education and the capitalist economy, focusing

on how education prepares individuals for their roles in the

workforce and perpetuates the division of labor.


Hidden Curriculum in Education: Analyze the concept of the

hidden curriculum and its implications for students'

socialization and reproduction of dominant ideologies.


Possibilities for Critical Pedagogy: What are we doing in this class? 

Can we implement critical pedagogy in educational

settings to encourage students to question and challenge existing

power structures and social norms?


Education and Social Change: Explore the potential role of

education in promoting social change and advancing

towards a more equitable and just society, as envisioned by

Marxist theory.


Monday, February 26, 2024

Vulture and child

  1. What does the situation in the video reveal about 

inequalities between countries in the Global North 

and Global South?

  1. How do historical factors like colonialism and 

global economic systems contribute to the conditions 

shown in the video?

  1. In what ways does access to resources (food, 

healthcare, aid) reflect global inequality?


  1. What role do images like Kevin Carter’s photograph 

play in shaping global awareness of poverty and 

inequality?

  1. Do you think such images empower marginalized 

populations or exploit their suffering? Why?

  1. How might the story have been different if it had 

taken place in a wealthier country?


  1. What responsibilities do journalists and photographers 

have when documenting human suffering?

  1. Should individuals from wealthier countries 

feel a moral obligation to respond to situations 

like the one shown? Why or why not?


  1. How would different sociological perspectives 

(e.g., functionalism, conflict theory) interpret the 

events in the video?

  1.  From a conflict theory perspective, who benefits and 

who suffers from global inequality?

Monday, February 19, 2024

Rosa Parks

Rosa Parks. 


  1. How did Rosa Parks’ refusal to give up her seat challenge 

the social norms of her time?

  1. What forms of social control maintained segregation in the 

South, and how did Parks’ action disrupt these?

  1. How does labeling theory apply to the public’s perception of 

Rosa Parks after her arrest?

  1. How does the case of Rosa Parks illustrate the relationship 

between power, resistance, and the social definition of deviance?

  1. What were the short-term and long-term consequences of Rosa 

Parks’ deviance for both her and society?



Materials

  Materials for this class:  My platform: this one .  (Mon Campus) Book: let’s get it.  Syllabus: let’s get it.  Now, how do we work in this...